Original Research
Evaluation of eosin-5-maleimide flow cytometry test in the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis
The Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa | Vol 3, No 2 | a77 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36303/jmlstsa.2021.3.2.75
| © 2021 H. Mothi, J.P. Roodt, A.C. van Marle
| This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 14 January 2026 | Published: 21 December 2021
Submitted: 14 January 2026 | Published: 21 December 2021
About the author(s)
H. Mothi, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, South Africa; and, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Universitas Academic Hospital Service Laboratory, South AfricaJ.P. Roodt, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, South Africa; and, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Universitas Academic Hospital Service Laboratory, South Africa
A.C. van Marle, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, South Africa; and, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Universitas Academic Hospital Service Laboratory, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (468KB)Abstract
Background: Hereditary spherocytosis (HS) is a genetically determined haemolytic anaemia characterised by the spherical shape of affected red blood cells. With limited confirmatory tests currently available in South Africa, the diagnosis of HS is reliant on the clinical presentation and screening tests. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three screening tests: flow osmotic fragility test (FOFT), cryohaemolysis test (CHT) and the eosin-5-maleimide binding test (EMA-binding test) used in the diagnosis of HS. Methods: All three tests were performed on 18 subjects with confirmed HS. The negative control group comprised 10 subjects with haemolysis and spherocytosis, and either a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) or normal red cell membrane studies. The tests were also performed on six samples submitted for cases of suspected HS during the study period from 7 November 2019 to 31 March 2020. Results: The EMA-binding test demonstrated superior sensitivity (88.9%) compared to the CHT (61.1%) and the FOFT (38.8%). The EMA-binding test specificity (90.0%) was equal to that of the FOFT and superior to the CHT (50%). Combined sensitivities and specificities for EMA-binding test and CHT, EMA-binding test and FOFT, and CHT and FOFT, were 100% and 33.3%, 94.4% and 80.0% and 88.9% and 50.0%, respectively. Conclusion: EMA-binding test is the best screening test for cases of suspected HS. If there is a high clinical index of suspicion with a negative EMA-binding test, the CHT is recommended as a second screening test.
Keywords
hereditary spherocytosis; eosin-5-maleimide; flow osmotic fragility; cryohaemolysis; screening test; red cell membrane; South Africa
Metrics
Total abstract views: 202Total article views: 203
