Original Research

Student preparedness for work-integrated learning in biomedical technology: student perspective

D. Govender, D.R. Prakaschandra, M.J. Mohapi
The Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa | Vol 3, No 2 | a70 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.36303/jmlstsa.2021.3.2.88 | © 2021 D. Govender, D.R. Prakaschandra, M.J. Mohapi | This work is licensed under Other
Submitted: 14 January 2026 | Published: 21 December 2021

About the author(s)

D. Govender, Biomedical Technology Programme, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Technology, Durban University of Technology, South Africa
D.R. Prakaschandra, Clinical Technology Programme, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Technology, Durban University of Technology, South Africa
M.J. Mohapi, Clinical Technology Programme, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Technology, Durban University of Technology, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (107KB)

Abstract

Background: Work-integrated learning (WIL) is one of the key tools for developing graduate attributes for the world of work. There is a paucity of published data which ascertains the degree to which students in the biomedical technology programme are prepared for undertaking WIL. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to determine the degree of work preparedness through a descriptive analysis of the perceptions of students regarding WIL and their experiences thereof.
Methods: The tools consisted of a survey questionnaire (Likert scale 1–5) and open-ended questions which were conducted around the following areas: orientation to the workplace, training at the University of Technology, organisation structure and culture, as well as knowledge.
Results: Data from 28 participants were surveyed. The Cronbach’s alpha showed an overall reliability score of an excellent degree of internal consistent scoring for the variables under study. The main findings in this study were that biomedical technology students were generally satisfied with the WIL orientation and the workplace orientation programme. Inadequate theoretical background of the profession/discipline and disjuncture between content taught at the university and what students were exposed to at the workplace emerged as the main concerns.
Conclusion: This study investigated student preparedness for WIL and adds impetus to involvement of industry stakeholders in all aspects of the curriculum.

Keywords

work-integrated learning; experiential learning; medical laboratory practice; biomedical technology

Metrics

Total abstract views: 418
Total article views: 188

 

Crossref Citations

1. Resilience from the perspective of diagnostic radiography students
H. Thomas, K. Naidoo, P. Engel-Hills
Radiography  vol: 29  issue: 1  first page: 56  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.001

2. The role of work‐integrated learning in the European Higher Education Area: A systematic review
Andreu Curto‐Reverte, Maria Carme Peguera‐Carré, Helena Cobos‐Rius, Cristina Vidal‐Marti
Review of Education  vol: 13  issue: 3  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1002/rev3.70114

3. Exploring the Challenges Experienced During the Work-integrated Learning of Economic and Management Sciences Student Teachers at a Rural University: A Relational Leadership Approach
Habasisa Vincent Molise, Mapule Yvonne Segooa
Studies in Learning and Teaching  vol: 5  issue: 2  first page: 466  year: 2024  
doi: 10.46627/silet.v5i2.403

4. Clinical preparedness programme as perceived by first‐year diagnostic radiography students in South Africa
Heidi Thomas, Gerhardus George Visser Koch
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences  vol: 71  issue: 1  first page: 63  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.740

5. Conducting tracer studies to assess work-integrated learning programs
Gerrit van der Waldt, David J. Fourie, Cornel Malan
Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review  vol: 8  issue: 1  first page: 232  year: 2024  
doi: 10.22495/cgobrv8i1p20